All viral claims about Dominion Voting systems and other voting machines have been found to be without merit in court. Criticism of various voting systems exists in scholarly work, but has been mischaracterized as whistleblower-style revelation of conspiracy rather than what it is: low-level technical critique of security measures.
Often this legitimate critique is used as reference for unsubstantiated speculation in news media, with detractors failing to mention that all of these criticisms are accompanied by suggestions for improvement, many of which are heard and implemented by voting systems manufacturers long before the work goes viral and has already been fixed by the time it ‘breaks’ as news.
All voting systems certified in North Carolina are extensively probed at a federal and state level for potential vulnerabilities and risk prior to certification and has been shown to hit all benchmarks for a ‘safe’ voting system prior to any live use. Any technical system is always improving, and painting ongoing improvements as proof of system inadequacy is a common tactic for eroding public trust in a system.
